Miranda Priestly may have earned the infamous title of "the devil," but a closer examination of *The Devil Wears Prada* reveals a more insidious villain lurking in the shadows: Andy Sachs's boyfriend, Nate Cooper, played by Adrian Grenier. While Miranda's demanding nature and ruthless ambition are undeniably problematic, Nate's actions represent a far more insidious form of antagonism – a blatant display of misogyny and a profound lack of support that ultimately undermines Andy's growth and happiness. This article will dissect Nate's role, exploring his behavior within the context of the film's narrative and addressing the broader implications of his character, examining him alongside Miranda as a "villain" and considering Adrian Grenier's own public persona and any related scandals.
The Devil Wears Prada Boyfriend: A Study in Passive Aggression
Nate Cooper embodies the archetype of the self-righteous, intellectually superior boyfriend who subtly sabotages his partner's ambition. He isn't overtly malicious like Miranda; his cruelty is far more insidious, wrapped in a veneer of concern and intellectual superiority. His criticisms of Andy's career aren't grounded in genuine concern for her well-being but rather stem from his own insecurities and inability to reconcile her success with his own perceived limitations. This is highlighted by his condescending dismissal of her work at *Runway*, viewing it as frivolous and shallow, a stark contrast to his idealized vision of a meaningful, socially conscious career.
Nate's disapproval isn't limited to mere words; his actions actively hinder Andy's progress. He constantly belittles her achievements, failing to recognize the sacrifices she makes and the immense pressure she endures. His disapproval manifests in passive-aggressive comments and pointed silences, creating a constant undercurrent of tension that undermines Andy's confidence and self-worth. He refuses to acknowledge the transformative impact of her job, failing to see the professional development and personal growth she experiences. Instead, he frames her dedication to her work as a betrayal of their relationship, positioning himself as the victim of her ambition.
This behavior is especially damaging considering Andy's initial vulnerability. She arrives in New York with a naive idealism, readily accepting Nate's worldview without questioning his biases. His persistent criticism erodes her self-confidence, leading her to doubt her choices and question her own judgment. This manipulation, though subtle, is profoundly effective, preventing Andy from fully embracing her newfound success and hindering her personal growth.
Devil Wears Prada Villains: A Comparison of Miranda and Nate
While Miranda Priestly is undoubtedly a formidable antagonist, her villainy is largely external. Her cruelty is often blunt and direct, making her motivations, albeit reprehensible, relatively transparent. She's a demanding boss, but her expectations, however unreasonable, are clearly stated. Furthermore, there are moments that hint at a softer side, a grudging respect for Andy's resilience, and even a subtle acknowledgment of her own flaws. Miranda's character arc, although limited, suggests a capacity for change and growth.
Nate, on the other hand, represents a more insidious form of villainy. His actions are covert, his criticisms veiled in a guise of concern. His emotional manipulation is far more damaging in the long run than Miranda's overt harshness. While Miranda's cruelty is primarily professional, Nate's attacks are deeply personal, targeting Andy's self-worth and undermining her confidence in her choices. Unlike Miranda, Nate shows no signs of self-reflection or remorse, consistently placing his own insecurities above Andy's aspirations. His lack of empathy and support ultimately contribute to Andy's internal conflict and her eventual decision to prioritize her career.
current url：https://cxfhnu.e518c.com/all/nate-and-andy-the-devil-wears-prada-95186